Spring fans demonstrate for re-opening
by Ron Georg
contributing writer
2 years ago | 700 views | 2 2 comments | 8 8 recommendations | email to a friend | print
This sign protesting the closure of Matrimony Spring urges authorities to reopen the popular water source to the public. A group of protestors staged a rally at the spring, located on state Route 128 northeast of Moab, on Saturday to voice their ongoing opposition to the February capping of the spring due to total coliform bacteria found in two subsequent tests of the water.
Photo by Ron Georg
This sign protesting the closure of Matrimony Spring urges authorities to reopen the popular water source to the public. A group of protestors staged a rally at the spring, located on state Route 128 northeast of Moab, on Saturday to voice their ongoing opposition to the February capping of the spring due to total coliform bacteria found in two subsequent tests of the water. Photo by Ron Georg
slideshow


Two dozen or so demonstrators gathered at Matrimony Spring last weekend to insist that the water flow freely. Most who assembled seemed aware of but unconcerned by the potential dangers of drinking from the untreated water source.

“There might be little strains here and there,” David Earl Brown said of the coliform bacteria that have shown up in the water. “But that’s going to happen when you’re seeping through sandstone. This might be the safest water sources anywhere. This stuff is filtering for so long; it’s taking years to get to this point.”

Moab resident Carly Williams was one of the north-end residents who last year detected trace levels of volatile organic compounds coming from the city’s Skakel water tank after the tank was repainted. Williams said it took more comprehensive testing from the state to verify that problem, and she hopes the state can provide guidance in this case.

“We’d like to see some sound science behind the closure,” Williams said. “It’s not just a matter of it being an icon, and all the other things we like about the spring, but we’d like to see the science behind it, that it’s a real health risk for anyone to use the water. If that’s established, and we can believe in that science, then I’ll buy it.”

“But I wouldn’t,” resident Kaki Hunter said. “I’d rather have it be ‘drink at your own risk,’ as any other water that’s running free here. There are a lot of springs in the area, like Kane Creek Springs, which people have been drinking from for many years, and have still not gotten sick. And according to the science for that spring, it has a much higher bacteria count.”

It isn’t the current bacteria count per se that caused Southeastern Utah District Health Environmental Health Scientist Jim Adamson to close the spring. The bacteria, coupled with gnat larvae found in the water, suggest the spring has been breached, and that water is seeping in from nearby, not just filtering down from the mountains, Adamson has said.

That could introduce fresh contaminants that wouldn’t be filtered out through sand and stone, and which could get into the water fairly quickly. The source of contaminants could be as simple as a diseased bird relieving itself above the spring, Adamson said.

Brown isn’t fazed by such possibilities. “There are chances of that happening anywhere with a water source,” he said. “Nowadays, we do a lot of that stuff to ourselves anyway. The bird scenario sounds like a good shake of the dice to me, compared to what we’re doing to ourselves.”
report abuse...

Express yourself:

We're glad to give readers a forum to express their points of view on issues important to this community. That forum is the “Letters to the Editor.” Letters to the editor may be submitted directly to The Times-Independent through this link and will be published in the print edition of the newspaper. All letters must be the original work of the letter writer – form letters will not be accepted. All letters must include the actual first and last name of the letter writer, the writer’s address, city and state and telephone number. Anonymous letters will not be accepted.

Letters may not exceed 400 words in length, must be regarding issues of general interest to the community, and may not include personal attacks, offensive language, ethnic or racial slurs, or attacks on personal or religious beliefs. Letters should focus on a single issue. Letters that proselytize or focus on theological debates will not be published. During political campaigns, The Times-Independent will not publish letters supporting or opposing any local candidate. Thank you letters are generally not accepted for publication unless the letter has a public purpose. Thank you letters dealing with private matters that compliment or complain about a business or individual will not be published. Nor will letters listing the names of individuals and/or businesses that supported a cause or event. Thank you letters about good Samaritan acts will be considered at the discretion of the newspaper.